If you're exploring web scraping solutions, you've likely encountered Olostep—a platform that promises AI-powered data extraction with minimal setup. While Olostep offers solid features like LLM-based extraction and Q&A capabilities, it may not be the perfect fit for every project. Whether you're looking for better pricing, more language support, simpler integration, or specialized features, this guide covers the best Olostep alternatives available in 2025.
Before diving into specific alternatives, check out our AI Web Scraping guide to understand how modern scraping platforms leverage AI, and our Web Scraping 101 for fundamental concepts.
Why Consider Olostep Alternatives?
Olostep is a capable platform, but teams often seek alternatives for several reasons:
- Language Support: Olostep requires HTTP API management, which can be verbose in some languages
- Pricing Structure: Different pricing models might better suit your usage patterns
- Feature Set: You may need specialized features like markdown conversion, sitemap extraction, or specific platform integrations
- Developer Experience: Some platforms offer more Pythonic or JavaScript-native interfaces
- Open Source Options: You might prefer solutions with open-source components or self-hosting options
Let's explore the top alternatives that address these needs.
Top Olostep Alternatives
1. ScrapeGraph AI (Best Overall Alternative)
ScrapeGraph is a comprehensive AI-powered scraping platform that combines ease of use with powerful features. It's particularly well-suited for Python developers but also supports JavaScript through a dedicated SDK.
Key Features:
- SmartScraper: Single-page extraction with natural language prompts
- SmartCrawler: Multi-page intelligent crawling with sitemap support
- Markdownify: Convert web pages to clean, structured markdown
- SearchScraper: Multi-page search with optional AI extraction
- Sitemap Extraction: Built-in sitemap parsing and URL management
- JavaScript SDK: Native Node.js support for JavaScript developers
Code Example:
from scrapegraph_py import Client
client = Client(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
# Simple scraping with natural language
response = client.smartscraper(
website_url="https://example.com/products",
user_prompt="Extract product names, prices, and availability"
)
print(response)
# Multi-page crawling
crawl_response = client.smartcrawler(
website_url="https://example.com",
user_prompt="Extract all blog post titles and dates",
max_depth=2,
max_pages=50,
sitemap=True
)
print(crawl_response)Why Choose ScrapeGraph:
- Python-first design with clean, intuitive API
- Built-in async handling (no manual polling)
- Excellent markdown conversion for content processing
- Strong documentation and community support
- Dedicated JavaScript SDK for Node.js projects
- Open-source library available (ScrapeGraphAI on GitHub)
Best For: Python developers, teams needing markdown output, projects requiring clean abstractions
Pricing: Flexible plans starting from free tier, with pay-as-you-go and enterprise options
Read the detailed Olostep vs ScrapeGraph comparison for more insights.
2. Firecrawl (Best for Markdown-First Workflows)
Firecrawl specializes in converting web content to markdown and structured data. It's designed for developers building RAG systems, documentation tools, or content processing pipelines.
Key Features:
- Fast markdown conversion with clean output
- Built-in LLM extraction using schemas
- Crawling with configurable depth and patterns
- Screenshot capture capabilities
- API-first design with multiple SDKs
Code Example:
from firecrawl import FirecrawlApp
app = FirecrawlApp(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
# Scrape and convert to markdown
result = app.scrape_url(
'https://example.com',
params={'formats': ['markdown', 'html']}
)
print(result['markdown'])Why Choose Firecrawl:
- Exceptional markdown quality
- Built for RAG and LLM workflows
- Fast processing times
- Good for documentation extraction
Best For: RAG systems, content indexing, documentation processing
Pricing: Usage-based with generous free tier
Compare ScrapeGraph vs Firecrawl for a detailed analysis.
3. Apify (Best for Complex Enterprise Workflows)
Apify is a mature, full-featured platform with a marketplace of pre-built scrapers ("Actors") and powerful workflow automation.
Key Features:
- Massive marketplace of pre-built scrapers
- Visual workflow builder
- Scheduled runs and monitoring
- Data storage and webhooks
- Proxy management and residential IPs
- Browser automation with Playwright/Puppeteer
Code Example:
from apify_client import ApifyClient
client = ApifyClient("YOUR_API_KEY")
# Run a pre-built actor
run = client.actor("apify/web-scraper").call(
run_input={
"startUrls": [{"url": "https://example.com"}],
"pageFunction": """
async function pageFunction(context) {
return {
title: context.page.title(),
url: context.request.url
};
}
"""
}
)
# Fetch results
for item in client.dataset(run["defaultDatasetId"]).iterate_items():
print(item)Why Choose Apify:
- Huge ecosystem of pre-built scrapers
- Enterprise-grade reliability
- Advanced scheduling and monitoring
- Excellent for complex multi-step workflows
Best For: Enterprise teams, complex scraping pipelines, teams needing pre-built scrapers
Pricing: Credit-based system, higher cost but comprehensive features
Learn more in our ScrapeGraph vs Apify comparison.
4. Browserbase (Best for Browser Automation)
Browserbase provides hosted browser instances optimized for scraping and automation. It's ideal for JavaScript-heavy sites requiring full browser rendering.
Key Features:
- Serverless browser automation
- Full Playwright/Puppeteer compatibility
- Session recording and debugging
- Built-in proxy rotation
- Stealth mode to avoid detection
Code Example:
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
import os
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.connect(
f"wss://connect.browserbase.com?apiKey={os.environ['BROWSERBASE_API_KEY']}"
)
page = browser.new_page()
page.goto("https://example.com")
# Extract data
products = page.query_selector_all(".product")
for product in products:
title = product.query_selector(".title").inner_text()
price = product.query_selector(".price").inner_text()
print(f"{title}: {price}")
browser.close()Why Choose Browserbase:
- Full browser automation without infrastructure
- Perfect for JavaScript-heavy sites
- Debugging tools and session replay
- Compatible with existing Playwright/Puppeteer code
Best For: Browser automation, JavaScript-heavy sites, teams already using Playwright
Pricing: Session-based pricing with free trial
Compare ScrapeGraph vs Browserbase.
5. Bright Data (Best for Large-Scale Enterprise)
Bright Data (formerly Luminati) is an enterprise-focused platform offering web scraping, proxy networks, and ready-made datasets.
Key Features:
- Massive proxy network (residential, mobile, datacenter)
- Pre-collected datasets for major platforms
- Custom scraping solutions
- GDPR-compliant data collection
- Dedicated account management
Why Choose Bright Data:
- Unmatched proxy network quality
- Pre-collected datasets save development time
- Enterprise SLAs and compliance
- White-glove service for large accounts
Best For: Large enterprises, teams needing extensive proxy infrastructure
Pricing: Premium pricing with custom enterprise plans
6. ScrapingBee (Best for Simple API Integration)
ScrapingBee offers a straightforward API for rendering JavaScript and scraping websites without the complexity of managing browsers.
Key Features:
- Simple API for JavaScript rendering
- Automatic proxy rotation
- CAPTCHA solving
- Screenshot capabilities
- No browser management needed
Code Example:
from scrapingbee import ScrapingBeeClient
client = ScrapingBeeClient(api_key='YOUR_API_KEY')
response = client.get(
'https://example.com',
params={
'render_js': True,
'premium_proxy': True
}
)
print(response.content)Why Choose ScrapingBee:
- Simple, no-frills API
- Good for JavaScript rendering
- Transparent pricing
- Easy to integrate
Best For: Small to medium projects, teams wanting simplicity
Pricing: Request-based with various tiers
7. Diffbot (Best for Structured Knowledge Extraction)
Diffbot uses AI to automatically identify and extract structured data from web pages without requiring selectors or prompts.
Key Features:
- Automatic article, product, and discussion extraction
- Knowledge Graph for entity relationships
- Natural Language API
- Video and image analysis
Why Choose Diffbot:
- Zero configuration for common page types
- Advanced entity extraction
- Built-in knowledge graph
Best For: Content aggregation, knowledge base building, automatic classification
Pricing: Enterprise-focused with custom pricing
Compare ScrapeGraph vs Diffbot.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | Olostep | ScrapeGraph | Firecrawl | Apify | Browserbase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API Type | REST | Python Client + REST | REST + SDK | SDK + Web UI | Browser Connect |
| AI Extraction | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Via Actors | ❌ No |
| Markdown Output | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅✅ Excellent | ⚠️ Via config | ❌ No |
| Multi-page Crawling | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅✅ Advanced | ✅ Manual |
| JavaScript Support | ⚠️ HTTP only | ✅ SDK | ✅ SDK | ✅✅ SDK + UI | ✅✅ Native |
| Python Support | ⚠️ HTTP only | ✅✅ Native | ✅ SDK | ✅ SDK | ✅ SDK |
| Open Source | ❌ No | ✅ Library | ❌ No | ⚠️ Actors | ❌ No |
| Sitemap Support | ⚠️ Via maps | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Manual |
| Async Handling | ⚠️ Manual poll | ✅ Automatic | ✅ Automatic | ✅ Automatic | N/A |
| Learning Curve | Medium | Low | Low | High | Medium |
| Pricing | Usage-based | Flexible tiers | Usage-based | Credit system | Session-based |
Use Case Recommendations
For Python-Centric Teams
Choose: ScrapeGraph
ScrapeGraph offers the most Pythonic experience with clean abstractions and no manual HTTP management. Perfect for data scientists and Python developers.
from scrapegraph_py import Client
client = Client(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
# One-liner scraping
result = client.smartscraper(
website_url="https://example.com",
user_prompt="Extract all product data"
)Learn more in our Python web scraping guide.
For Content Processing & RAG Systems
Choose: Firecrawl or ScrapeGraph
Both excel at markdown conversion, crucial for RAG pipelines and LLM training data.
# ScrapeGraph markdown
client = Client(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
markdown = client.markdownify(website_url="https://example.com/article")Read about integrating scraping with LlamaIndex for RAG workflows.
For Complex Enterprise Workflows
Choose: Apify
Apify's actor marketplace and visual workflow builder make it ideal for complex, multi-step scraping operations.
See our enterprise scraping guide for production considerations.
For JavaScript-Heavy Sites
Choose: Browserbase or ScrapeGraph
Both handle JavaScript rendering well. Browserbase gives you full browser control, while ScrapeGraph abstracts the complexity.
Learn about handling heavy JavaScript in our dedicated guide.
For Budget-Conscious Projects
Choose: ScrapeGraph (Free Tier)
ScrapeGraph offers a generous free tier and transparent pricing, making it accessible for startups and small projects.
Check out our pricing page for current rates.
Migration Guide: From Olostep to ScrapeGraph
If you're migrating from Olostep to ScrapeGraph, here's a side-by-side comparison of common operations:
Single Page Scraping
Olostep:
import requests
url = "https://api.olostep.com/v1/scrapes"
payload = {
"url_to_scrape": "https://example.com",
"formats": ["json"],
"llm_extract": {
"prompt": "extract name, position, history"
}
}
headers = {
"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
response = requests.post(url, json=payload, headers=headers)
data = response.json()ScrapeGraph:
from scrapegraph_py import Client
client = Client(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
response = client.smartscraper(
website_url="https://example.com",
user_prompt="extract name, position, history"
)Multi-Page Crawling
Olostep:
import requests
import time
API_URL = 'https://api.olostep.com/v1'
headers = {
'Authorization': f'Bearer {API_KEY}',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
# Initiate crawl
data = {
"start_url": "https://example.com",
"max_depth": 3,
"max_pages": 10
}
response = requests.post(f'{API_URL}/crawls', headers=headers, json=data)
crawl_id = response.json()['id']
# Poll for completion
while True:
info = requests.get(f'{API_URL}/crawls/{crawl_id}', headers=headers).json()
if info['status'] == 'completed':
break
time.sleep(5)
# Get results
results = requests.get(
f'{API_URL}/crawls/{crawl_id}/pages',
headers=headers
).json()ScrapeGraph:
from scrapegraph_py import Client
client = Client(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
# No polling needed - handled internally
response = client.smartcrawler(
website_url="https://example.com",
user_prompt="Extract data from all pages",
max_depth=3,
max_pages=10
)The ScrapeGraph approach reduces code by ~70% and eliminates manual polling logic.
Performance Considerations
When evaluating alternatives, consider these performance factors:
Response Time
- ScrapeGraph: Typically 2-5 seconds for simple pages
- Firecrawl: 1-3 seconds for markdown conversion
- Apify: Varies by actor, generally 3-10 seconds
- Browserbase: Depends on page complexity, 5-15 seconds
Rate Limits
Different platforms have different rate limiting approaches:
- ScrapeGraph: Tier-based concurrent request limits
- Olostep: API rate limits based on plan
- Apify: Credit consumption based on compute time
- ScrapingBee: Request-based quotas
Learn about scaling to production and handling large-scale scraping.
Common Use Cases
E-commerce Scraping
All platforms can handle e-commerce sites. ScrapeGraph offers specific guides for:
Social Media Data
Extract data from social platforms:
Business Intelligence
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Olostep alternative is most similar in functionality?
ScrapeGraph offers the closest feature parity with Olostep, including AI-powered extraction, multi-page crawling, and multiple output formats. The main difference is ScrapeGraph's Python-first approach versus Olostep's HTTP-centric API.
Are these alternatives more affordable than Olostep?
Pricing varies by usage pattern. ScrapeGraph and Firecrawl typically offer more competitive pricing for small to medium workloads, while Apify and Bright Data are positioned for enterprise budgets. Check each platform's pricing page for current rates.
Can I use these alternatives with languages other than Python?
Yes. While ScrapeGraph has a Python client, it also offers a JavaScript SDK and REST API. Apify, Firecrawl, and ScrapingBee all provide SDKs for multiple languages. Browserbase works with any language that supports Playwright/Puppeteer.
Do these platforms handle CAPTCHA and anti-bot measures?
Most platforms include some anti-bot protection:
- ScrapeGraph: Built-in browser fingerprint management
- Apify: Stealth plugins and proxy rotation
- Bright Data: Advanced proxy network with CAPTCHA solving
- ScrapingBee: Optional CAPTCHA solving add-on
Learn more about avoiding detection.
Is web scraping with these tools legal?
Web scraping legality depends on what and how you scrape, not which tool you use. Read our comprehensive guides on:
Can I try these alternatives for free?
Most platforms offer free tiers or trials:
- ScrapeGraph: Free tier available
- Firecrawl: Generous free tier
- Apify: Free credits on signup
- Browserbase: Free trial available
- ScrapingBee: 1000 free API credits
Which alternative is best for beginners?
ScrapeGraph and ScrapingBee are the most beginner-friendly due to their simple APIs and good documentation. Start with our Web Scraping 101 guide and common mistakes to avoid.
Can these tools integrate with AI agents and LLMs?
Yes, particularly ScrapeGraph which offers dedicated integrations:
Conclusion
While Olostep is a capable scraping platform, the alternatives discussed here each offer unique advantages:
- ScrapeGraph provides the best overall developer experience for Python teams
- Firecrawl excels at markdown conversion for content processing
- Apify offers unmatched ecosystem and enterprise features
- Browserbase gives full browser automation control
- Bright Data provides enterprise-scale infrastructure
- ScrapingBee keeps things simple and affordable
Your choice should depend on:
- Primary programming language (Python → ScrapeGraph, JavaScript → ScrapeGraph SDK or Browserbase)
- Use case (Content processing → Firecrawl, Complex workflows → Apify)
- Budget (Small projects → ScrapeGraph/ScrapingBee, Enterprise → Bright Data/Apify)
- Technical expertise (Beginners → ScrapeGraph, Advanced → Browserbase)
Most platforms offer free tiers or trials, so we recommend testing 2-3 alternatives with your specific use case before committing to a paid plan.
Ready to get started? Check out our ScrapeGraph tutorial for a step-by-step walkthrough, or explore our complete guide to AI web scraping.
Related Resources
Platform Comparisons
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraph - Detailed head-to-head comparison
- ScrapeGraph vs Firecrawl - Markdown and RAG workflows
- ScrapeGraph vs Apify - Enterprise features
- ScrapeGraph vs Browserbase - Browser automation
- ScrapeGraph vs Diffbot - Knowledge extraction
- Browse AI alternatives - No-code options
Getting Started
- Web Scraping 101 - Complete beginner's guide
- ScrapeGraph Tutorial - Step-by-step walkthrough
- Python Web Scraping - Python guide
- JavaScript Web Scraping - Node.js guide
Advanced Topics
- Handling Heavy JavaScript - JavaScript rendering
- Avoiding Detection - Anti-bot measures
- Production Scraping Pipeline - Scale to production
- Large-Scale AI Scraping - Enterprise scale
Specific Use Cases
- Best Amazon Scraper - E-commerce scraping
- Real Estate Scraping - Property data
- Job Posting Scraping - Employment data
- Social Media Trends - Social platforms
Legal & Compliance
- Is Web Scraping Legal? - Legal considerations
- Compliance Best Practices - Stay compliant
- Ethical Scraping - Scraping ethics
Note: This comparison is based on publicly available information as of November 2025. Features and pricing may change. Always refer to official documentation for the most current information.
